لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Delay in recording confessional statement will not be treated fatal on the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there is usually a delay of at some point inside the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there isn't any eye-witness from the alleged prevalence and also the prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession in the petitioners has become tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to become the real brothers of the deceased but they did not react whatsoever towards the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, a person after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not appear much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation regarding why her arrest was not effected after making of your alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a lot of events that extra judicial confession of an accused is a weak variety of evidence which may very well be manoeuvred via the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution can also be depending on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal didn't say a word concerning presence of some light with the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners with each other on the motorcycle at 4.
Section 302 with the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to work as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application with the death penalty or life imprisonment depends within the specifics of each and every case, which includes any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID necessary) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts with the purpose of confirming of the individual’s date of birth.
Section 302 in the PPC deals with one of many most severe offenses in criminal regulation: murder. In this blog site post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, check out the punishment it involves, and evaluate some notable case laws related to this particular section.
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation incorporates the names on the parties to the first case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it absolutely was decided, plus the book in which it's recorded. Different citation requirements may perhaps contain italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
Extra username and password are required for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its initial purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more
VI) The petitioner is guiding the bars considering the fact that arrest, investigation from the case is complete, he is no more expected defeating the ends of justice case law to the purpose of investigation and at this stage to maintain him powering the bars before conclusion of trial will serve no beneficial purpose.
If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only done If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence as well as the petitioner company responded for the allegations therefore they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
This article delves into the intricacies on the recent amendment, accompanied by relevant case regulation, to provide an extensive understanding of its implications and practical applications.
competent authority has determined the eligibility of the private respondents and found them being fit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)